In Masterpiece v. Colorado, Justice Gorsuch argues there is no principled way, on First Amendment grounds, to distinguish refusing to make a cake for a same-sex wedding versus refusing to make a cake with anti-LGBT words and symbols.

I argue that this conclusion is mistaken. https://t.co/TF7zhkuYIo

Reply on Twitter 1149362304854691846 Retweet on Twitter 11493623048546918462 Like on Twitter 11493623048546918464 Twitter 1149362304854691846

Harvard CRCL @HarvardCRCL·

11 Jul

“[T]he questions about how the Supreme Court will balance LGBT civil rights and religious freedom rights in cases like this remained unanswered.”

@mark_satta with a superb analysis of Justice Gorsuch’s logical fallacy in his Masterpiece concurrence.

https://t.co/B3nrHs6kDR

Reply on Twitter 1149327847317786626 Retweet on Twitter 1149327847317786626 Like on Twitter 11493278473177866263 Twitter 1149327847317786626

Retweet on Twitter Harvard CRCL Retweeted

Kenneth Gibbs @KennyGibbsPhD·

6 Jul

My wife just published her first scholarly article, "Paper Courts & Parental Rights: Balancing Access, Agency, and Due Process," in the @HarvardCRCL. I'm proud the world can see her brilliance 🙂

Reply on Twitter 1147594569321783297 Retweet on Twitter 11475945693217832972 Like on Twitter 114759456932178329758 Twitter 1147594569321783297

Retweet on Twitter Harvard CRCL Retweeted

Monica Bell @monicacbell·

9 Jul

New essay in @HarvardCRCL: Safety, friendship, and dreams should be central to 21st c. racial justice agenda; begins with "empirical poetry" drawing from interview participants' narratives. Eager for feedback... https://t.co/0SuugwCH1U

Reply on Twitter 1148602220742610944 Retweet on Twitter 114860222074261094421 Like on Twitter 1148602220742610944135 Twitter 1148602220742610944

Retweet on Twitter Harvard CRCL Retweeted

Michael Allen @allencivrights·

8 Jul

Thoughtful piece co-authored by Alisha Jarwala, an alum of @relmanlaw. Breaking new ground. Watch out for this new generation of civil rights warriors! https://t.co/11pghTAtJu

Reply on Twitter 1148262941088727042 Retweet on Twitter 11482629410887270425 Like on Twitter 114826294108872704214 Twitter 1148262941088727042

Retweet on Twitter Harvard CRCL Retweeted

Sasha Samberg-Champion @ssamcham·

8 Jul

This is an excellent piece about an important problem that too few people know about. Well worth the read. https://t.co/QCXdqajl50

Reply on Twitter 1148225102825345026 Retweet on Twitter 114822510282534502615 Like on Twitter 114822510282534502637 Twitter 1148225102825345026

Retweet on Twitter Harvard CRCL Retweeted

Sejal Singh @Sej_Singh·

8 Jul

Chronic nuisance ordinances evict people for being people of color, survivors, disabled, or some combination of all three. That’s why Alisha and I argue that they violate the Fair Housing Act, the ADA, and the Constitution. You can read it for free here: https://t.co/pNpZlTU1KS

Reply on Twitter 1148230246736547841 Retweet on Twitter 11482302467365478418 Like on Twitter 114823024673654784114 Twitter 1148230246736547841

Retweet on Twitter Harvard CRCL Retweeted

Sejal Singh @Sej_Singh·

8 Jul

Predictably, nuisance ordinances impact people of color — for example, @NYCLU found they were enforced almost 5x as much in the parts of the city with the most people of color. @just_shelter found that CNOs were enforced 2.5x as often in predominantly black parts of Milwaukee.

Reply on Twitter 1148228781141835778 Retweet on Twitter 11482287811418357784 Like on Twitter 114822878114183577811 Twitter 1148228781141835778