Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
 
  • Home
  • Issue Areas
    • Consumers and Corporations
    • Criminal Justice
    • Education
    • First Amendment
    • Human Rights
    • Labor and Employment
    • LGBTQ Rights
    • Poverty and Economic Justice
    • Privacy and National Security
    • Race and Immigration
    • Reproductive Rights
    • Sex Equality
    • Voting and Elections
  • Scholarly Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Upcoming Issue
    • Print Archive
    • Amicus – CR-CL’s Online Companion
  • Colloquia
    • The State of Progressive Constitutional Theory: The Paradox of Constitutional Democracy and the Project of Political Justification
    • Roper, Graham, and J.D.B.: Redefining Juveniles’ Constitutional Rights
    • The Right to Comprehensive Educational Opportunity
    • The Case for Local Constitutional Enforcement
    • Gay Rights and Lefts
  • Podcast and Live Blogs
    • The Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Podcast
    • Ames Moot Court Live Blogs
      • Ames First Semifinal 2012
      • Ames Second Semifinal 2012
      • Ames Final Round 2011
      • Ames Semifinal Round 2011
      • Ames Final Round 2010
    • Colloquium Live Blogs
      • Colloquium Live Blog: The Right to Comprehensive Educational Opportunity
      • Colloquium Live Blog: The Case for Local Constitutional Enforcement
  • About CR-CL
    • Editorial Board
    • Online Contributors
    • Calendar of Events
  • Contact CR-CL
    • Submissions
    • Subscriptions
  • Join CR-CL
 

  • The State of Progressive Constitutional Theory: The Paradox of Constitutional Democracy and the Project of Political Justification

    March 30, 2012 12:04 pm no comments

    On Thursday, April 5, 2012, from 5-7PM in Wasserstein 1015 at Harvard Law School, CR-CL will present a colloquium, “The State of Progressive Constitutional Theory: The Paradox of Constitutional Democracy and the Project of Political Justification.” The colloquium honors the forthcoming article by Nimer Sultany exploring the perils and paradoxes inherent in the search for a progressive theory of the United States Constitution. Speakers will include Dean Martha Minow and Professors Karl Klare, Frank Michelman, and Duncan Kennedy.

     
  • Roper, Graham, and J.D.B.: Re-Defining Juveniles' Constitutional Rights

    March 21, 2012 8:59 am no comments
     
  • CR-CL Presents a Colloquium, "The Right to Comprehensive Educational Opportunity."

    October 7, 2011 2:49 pm 1 comment
     
  • CR-CL Presents a Colloquium, "The Case for Local Constitutional Enforcement."

    September 14, 2011 9:06 am no comments
     
  • CR-CL Presents a Colloquium, “Gay Rights and Lefts: Rights Critique and the Distributive Analysis.”

    September 2, 2011 12:12 pm no comments
     
 
 

Connect With CRCL

  • RSS RSSSubscribe
  •  E-MAIL USGet In Touch
  •  TWITTERFollow Us
  •  FACEBOOKLike Us
 
 

Popular

  • [Update] Supreme Court Won't Review Duty To Cheer For Your Rapist
    18 comments
  • Would Oklahoma anti-Sharia law violate tribal treaties?
    17 comments
  • Maryland Legislature Votes To Guarantee In-State Tuition To Undocumented Immigrants
    16 comments
  • In America, Privacy Takes a Back Seat
    13 comments
  • Clarence Thomas to Wrongfully Convicted Louisiana Death Row Inmate: "You Get Nothing."
    13 comments
  • In Their Own Words: The Fight to Save Tucson's Ethnic Studies Program
    11 comments
  • Essay: is WikiLeaks more dangerous than the alternative?
    9 comments
  • In Their Own Words - Fl. Governor Rick Scott & Economic Profiling
    9 comments
  • Health Care's March Towards the Supreme Court
    8 comments
  • National Guard prepped to maintain labor discipline in Wisconsin
    8 comments

Comments

  • Noah Kaplan: Phil, I appreciate your thorough response. The reason my initial reaction
  • Philip Petrov: Your comment, Noah, failed to address my conclusion that fraternities (read
  • Alex Groden: Great points Josh. It’s definitely a disappointing turn for Kennedy, and
  • Josh Freiman: Very useful post. I think you're quite right that the opinion is part of a
  • Noah Kaplan: Phil, I have to agree that your reflections are no doubt polemical. In one
  • Noah Kaplan: Ryan, thank you for the thoughtful comments. We agree that comments from l
  • Ryan Jendoubi: Since I tend to listen to the CRCL podcast while on the move, I often negle

Search

Tags

9th circuit Abortion Rights Adoption Affirmative Action Arizona Buckley California Campaign Finance Civil Liberties Civil Rights colloquium courts Criminal Justice death penalty defense of marriage act discrimination doma Education equal protection Establishment Clause First Amendment Fourth Amendment Free Speech Gay Rights Google Government Accountability health care Human Rights immigration Internet Judges justice department marriage equality Obama Administration Planned Parenthood Prisoners' Rights privacy race Religion reproductive rights Supreme Court technology terrorism texas Women's Rights
 

Tags

9th circuit Abortion Rights Adoption Affirmative Action Arizona Buckley California Campaign Finance Civil Liberties Civil Rights colloquium courts Criminal Justice death penalty defense of marriage act discrimination doma Education equal protection Establishment Clause First Amendment Fourth Amendment Free Speech Gay Rights Google Government Accountability health care Human Rights immigration Internet Judges justice department marriage equality Obama Administration Planned Parenthood Prisoners' Rights privacy race Religion reproductive rights Supreme Court technology terrorism texas Women's Rights
 

Archive

 
 
 

A HLS Student Journal

Copyright © 2012 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review. All Rights Reserved.

  • About CR-CL
  • Current Issue
  • Amicus
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Submissions
  • Subscriptions
  • Contact Us
  • Editing Suite
  • Log-In